7迹象表明,是时候从员工过渡到企业家了 创建赚钱博客的快速指南 创业公司吸引风投的4种方式 5谎言世界告诉企业家如何成功 Bootstrapers的优势: 稀缺性提升创造力 向朋友和家人借钱的硬道理和技巧 如何成为自己的老板并在工作中喝酒 企业家的奥秘: 关于创业的5个常见误区 两名妇女开办学校教人们如何成人 如何在9比5的工作中启动您的创业公司 4种方法来决定你是否应该追求你的创业理念 引导最聪明的方式 在与投资者建立联系之前,您必须做的10件事 热情的企业家即使在袜子行业也能找到成功 2021年中小企业数字化赋能系列活动数字赋能融合发展论坛成功召开 6辞职成为企业家的强大好处 研究: 企业选择自由职业者来逃避医疗费用 您是否有能力使您的承包业务取得成功? 停止抱怨,开始胡搞 在前100天获得动力。否则。 你有专业知识让你的承包业务取得成功吗? 鲨鱼坦克的戴蒙德·约翰 (Daymond John) 说,您必须做的3件事可以帮助您的初创公司生存 两小时销售1817万!江西“百县百日”文旅消费季 直播带货大赛正式拉开帷幕 您的公司在启动时可以做的4件事 在您的业务启动前几个月建立炒作的7种方法 你讨厌的朝九晚五的工作并不像你想象的那么安全 购物特许经营时首先要寻找什么 这家公司如何在赚钱的同时有所作为 建立6位数咨询的5个步骤 教练是完美的个人业务的8个原因 党日活动--观看抗美援朝电影《长津湖》 在线课程可能没有您希望的那么有价值 为什么逆戟鲸岛出租车从一个小岛上获得大笔生意 美国各地的社区都在利用企业家精神来推动增长 这是一项6位数的服务业务,您可以以低于100美元的价格开始 企业家应该总是涉足副业。这就是原因。 研究商机时要考虑什么 在为公司聘请公司法律顾问之前,您需要的4个答案 大便! 一个创业故事被释放了。 从员工到所有者转变思维的8种方法 3种类型的体验将帮助你的创业成功 你需要知道的关于打入视频游戏行业的一切 破解App Store代码的5种方法 想成为一名成功的企业家吗?做你知道的。 从他的公寓里打乱一个沉睡的巨人 利基微型公司将如何统治商业世界 帮助您的公司避免顶级创业杀手的4种策略 您的商业贷款被拒绝的8个原因 我从指导世界上最好的加速器的初创公司中学到的东西 如何将你的爱好变成有利可图的商业冒险
您的位置:首页 >万象 >

2 Questions to Ask Before You Fire Someone

2021-06-08 10:11:15 来源:

When JT McCormick took over as the new CEO ofthe book publishing company I co-founded, one of the first things he did was evaluate the current team. We knew we had one or two people who probably weren't performing, but we didn't think major changes were coming.

He wanted to fire at least five of 14. 也许更多。

Of course we totally disagreed with him. How could he think that, after only dealing with them for a few weeks? Then he explained."I use a simple but powerful test.For each person, I ask,1. Would I enthusiastically rehire them today?2. If not, can they be coached up to meet that standard?"

58003 "They get 90 days, and they either meet the standard or they don't."

He continues, "if theanswer to both questions is no, fire them with dignity and respect,but do it as quickly as possible."

We went through the whole team, one by one. It was one of the most painful hours of my life. He was totally right. There were a lotof people on our team we would not enthusiastically rehire. Or maybe not rehire at all.

For each of those, we discussed whether we could coach them up or not. This was much harder to p out. McCormick had a simple process that helped, which is very similar to the hiring process he later implemented at our company.To see if someone can be coached up, ask these questions, McCormick advises:

What are the skills their job requires?

Have you seen evidence of these skills in their work?

If yes, why are they not getting results? Where is the disconnect?

If no, do you see evidence they can learn these skills with coaching?

Here's an example of how this worked with a salesperson:

What are all the skills the job requires? For us, sales requires good organization, good command of book publishing information, excellent phone skills, the ability to quickly build rapport, and the ability to be authoritative, but still warm and enthusiastic.

Have you seen evidence of these skills in their work? This inpidual has shown good organization skills and good command of book publishing information, and some ability to convey authority. His conversation and phone skills are below average, and he has not shown ability to build rapport, or convey warmth or enthusiasm.

If yes, why are they not getting results? Where is the disconnect? 不适用

If no, do you see evidence they can quickly learn these skills? He's been coached extensively in relationships and warmth, and he has not shown much change. His calls still feel cold,mechanical and judgmental to potential authors. He doesn't seem receptive to feedback on this issue, argues with and resists the approach.

This process really made everything clear. It helped us see exactly where the non-performers were struggling, enabled us to evaluate whether we were able to coach them up, and if so, what the exact plan would be to get them up to par.

We did this with all the people we weren't excited about rehiring, and I have to be honest --I fought almost every conclusion. I didn't really argue with the factual evaluations, because the facts weren't really under dispute, and it was clearly correct that lots of our people were not meeting our standards.

But I fought the conclusion from those facts. Why did we have to fire them? They were good people, I liked them, I wanted them to succeed. McCormick stopped me."It's great that you care about them," he said. "But no one wins if they're in the wrong job. The company losesbecause the job isn't being done. They losebecause they aren't developing, and they aren't contributing and being valued.

"When you make hiring mistakes, it's better to admit them and take your medicine. Hell man, everyone makes hiring mistakes. I've made a ton. It's OK.But you know why I've always had amazing teams at all my companies? 58003

他是对的。 The only thing worse than making a hiring mistake is to keep making that mistakebecause you won't admit to yourself that you made it (this is called the Sunk Cost Fallacy). Everyone loses when the wrong people are in the wrong jobs.

By the time we were done four months later, we'd fired all five people that our CEO identified early on. We made real efforts to coach up each of them, but they just did not have the skills for the specific job they were in --which is why hiring the right people to begin with is so crucially important.

The cool thing about this? The way our new CEO coached them was so great, four of the fivewere not upset at all. 58003 How he did this will be thesubject of a future article.

免责声明:本网站所有信息仅供参考,不做交易和服务的根据,如自行使用本网资料发生偏差,本站概不负责,亦不负任何法律责任。如有侵权行为,请第一时间联系我们修改或删除,多谢。

今日中国财经